Nissan Serena 1992 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Serena is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan Serena also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 67 - 140 HP | 75 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 186 NM | 146 - 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 - 31 seconds | 11.2 - 17.8 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Space Wagon are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Serena. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 11.1 | 7.9 - 10.8 | |
|
Nissan Serena petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. On average, Nissan Serena equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.59 m | |
| Nissan Serena is 19 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Serena is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
620 litres | 1714 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Space Wagon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 1094 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Serena is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Nissan Serena can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`150 kg | ~ 1`927 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`491 kg | ~ 1`394 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 659 kg | ~ 533 kg | |
| Nissan Serena load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Therefore, Nissan Serena is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |