Nissan Sentra 1998 vs Honda Accord 1998

 
Nissan Sentra
1998 - 2006
Honda Accord
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 177 HP212 HP
Torque: 244 NM215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 seconds7.2 seconds
Nissan Sentra engine produces 35 HP less power than Honda Accord, but torque is 29 NM more than Honda Accord.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.69.6
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 520 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
590 km on highway830 km on highway
Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 24 years11 years
Engine spread: Used also on Nissan X-TrailUsed also on Honda Prelude
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Sentra might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.60 m
Width: 1.71 m1.75 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Nissan Sentra is smaller.
Nissan Sentra is 9 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Sentra is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 329 litres430 litres
Honda Accord has more luggage space.
Nissan Sentra has 101 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: no data11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`2681`820
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Nissan Sentra has
  • timing chain engine
Honda Accord has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv