Nissan Sentra 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Nissan Sentra
2016 - 2019
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 130 HP120 HP
Torque: 174 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.8 seconds
Nissan Sentra engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda 3, but torque is 36 NM less than Mazda 3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.85.1
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Sentra consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Sentra could require 405 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
740 km on highway1180 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 166 mm (6.5 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Sentra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Sentra version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.78 m
Height: 1.50 m1.45 m
Nissan Sentra is 6 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Sentra is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 428 litres419 litres
Nissan Sentra has 9 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7341`815
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data13 000
Pros and Cons: Nissan Sentra has
  • more power
  • higher ground clearance
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv