Nissan Sentra 2016 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Nissan Sentra
2016 - 2019
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 188 HP104 HP
Torque: 240 NM144 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds13.5 seconds
Nissan Sentra engine produces 84 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Mazda 3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.46.3
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Sentra consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Sentra could require 315 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
680 km on highway1040 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 140 mm (5.5 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.50 m1.45 m
Nissan Sentra is 6 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Sentra is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 428 litres408 litres
Nissan Sentra has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8041`835
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data13 000
Pros and Cons: Nissan Sentra has
  • more power
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv