Nissan Sentra 2016 vs Kia Cerato 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 188 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 157 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Nissan Sentra engine produces 58 HP more power than Kia Cerato, whereas torque is 83 NM more than Kia Cerato. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 6.5 | |
The Kia Cerato is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Sentra consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Sentra could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
680 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Kia Cerato gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Kia Cerato 2013 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
Nissan Sentra is 8 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Sentra is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 428 litres | 482 litres | |
Kia Cerato has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Sentra has 54 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. This could mean that the Nissan Sentra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`804 | 1`720 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Sentra has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |