Nissan Sentra 2012 vs Mazda 3 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Sentra engine produces 35 HP less power than Mazda 3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 51 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 3 2013 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 3 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
| Nissan Sentra is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Sentra is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 511 litres | 419 litres | |
|
Nissan Sentra has more luggage capacity. Nissan Sentra has 92 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Sentra is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Nissan Sentra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Sentra has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |