Nissan Sentra 2012 vs Mazda 6 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Nissan Sentra engine produces 3 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Mazda 6. Despite less power, Nissan Sentra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 6 2010 1.8 engine: The engine often has an unstable idle speed. The thermostat, cooling pump, and alternator are weak points. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Nissan Sentra is smaller, but higher. Nissan Sentra is 13 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Sentra is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 511 litres | 519 litres | |
| Nissan Sentra has 8 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Sentra is 1.7 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Nissan Sentra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`216 | 1`885 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Sentra has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |