Nissan Sentra 1998 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Sentra is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Lancer has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 127 - 177 HP | 82 - 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 244 NM | 120 - 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 9.7 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.6 | 6.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Nissan Sentra petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Sentra is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Sentra is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 329 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Sentra has 101 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. This could mean that the Nissan Sentra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`217 | ~ 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Sentra has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |