Nissan Sentra 2012 vs Mazda 6 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.8 (petrol) | 1.8 - 3.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 - 130 HP | 120 - 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 165 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 11.3 seconds | 8.1 - 11.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.2 - 10.3 | |
|
Nissan Sentra petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Nissan Sentra is smaller, but higher. Nissan Sentra is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Sentra is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 511 litres | 519 litres | |
| Nissan Sentra has 8 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Sentra is 1.7 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Nissan Sentra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`227 | ~ 1`974 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Sentra has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |