Nissan Qashqai 2024 vs Toyota C-HR 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Qashqai) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Toyota C-HR) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Nissan Qashqai engine produces 6 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Despite the higher power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | =LNG_NAV_DATU?> | =LNG_NAV_DATU?> | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 43 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is larger. Nissan Qashqai is 7 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1440 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`180 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 800 | 32 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |
