Nissan Qashqai 2018 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen T-Roc, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen T-Roc. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2018 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2018 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.57 m | |
| Nissan Qashqai is 16 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1598 litres | 1290 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Qashqai uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 308 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`870 kg | 1`850 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`300 kg | 1`272 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 570 kg | 578 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |