Nissan Qashqai 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 131 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 59 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
1410 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
1000 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Nissan Qashqai 2011 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2011 1.6 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.33 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.97 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 575 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | no data | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 165 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`350 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7000 | 13 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |