Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Kia Sportage 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 34 HP less power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Kia Sportage. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 11 cm shorter than the Kia Sportage, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 564 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 154 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.58 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.02 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 8000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |