Nissan Qashqai 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Qashqai and Renault Kadjar have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
| By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 6 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1478 litres | |
| Nissan Qashqai has 42 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 107 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |