Nissan Qashqai 2017 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai and Volkswagen T-Roc have the same engine power, but Nissan Qashqai torque is 35 NM less than Volkswagen T-Roc. Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen T-Roc is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 161 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.57 m | |
| Nissan Qashqai is 16 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1290 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Qashqai has 15 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. This could mean that the Nissan Qashqai uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 295 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |