Nissan Qashqai 2017 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Toyota C-HR. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage capacity. Nissan Qashqai has 53 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.3 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |