Nissan Qashqai 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 159 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 44 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Used also on Nissan Qashqai | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 30 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Qashqai has 295 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 292 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |