Nissan Qashqai 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 35 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is larger, but lower. Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1206 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage capacity. Nissan Qashqai has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 379 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |