Nissan Qashqai 2017 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 65 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 59 NM less than Mazda CX-30. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.2 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-30 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-30 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai and Mazda CX-30 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |