Nissan Qashqai 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 134 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 200 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.9 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Qashqai consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.65 m | |
| Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Qashqai has 161 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Nissan Qashqai uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.9 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 40 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |