Nissan Qashqai 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 125 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 175 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.66 m | |
| Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Qashqai has 145 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Nissan Qashqai uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |