Nissan Qashqai 2017 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 185 HP less power than Jaguar E-Pace, whereas torque is 235 NM less than Jaguar E-Pace. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar E-Pace engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar E-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jaguar E-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai and Jaguar E-Pace are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 1234 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 2577 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 804 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 992 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.46 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.76 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |