Nissan Qashqai 2017 vs Cupra Ateca 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 185 HP less power than Cupra Ateca, whereas torque is 235 NM less than Cupra Ateca. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 7.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm longer than the Cupra Ateca, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.1 metres less than that of the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Cupra Ateca has
| |