Nissan Qashqai 2017 vs BMW X1 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 25 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 55 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X1 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija, BMW 4 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 5 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Nissan Qashqai has 75 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 35 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`025 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X1 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 32 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
BMW X1 has
| |