Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Ford Kuga 2008

 
Nissan Qashqai
2010 - 2014
Ford Kuga
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP136 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds10.7 seconds
Nissan Qashqai engine produces 6 HP less power than Ford Kuga, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.56.4
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1440 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
1660 km on highway1070 km on highway
Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ...  More about Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.33 m4.44 m
Width: 1.78 m1.84 m
Height: 1.62 m1.68 m
Nissan Qashqai is smaller.
Nissan Qashqai is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 388 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1513 litresno data
Ford Kuga has more luggage space.
Nissan Qashqai has 22 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga.
Turning diameter: 10.6 metersno data
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 2`085no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Ford Kuga has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford Kuga, so Ford Kuga quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 70006400
Rating in user reviews: 7.2/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Nissan Qashqai has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • electric power steering
Ford Kuga has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv