Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Kia Sportage 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 159 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 18 HP less power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Kia Sportage. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.8 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Sportage engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. Kia Sportage 2010 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Kia Sportage 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 11 cm shorter than the Kia Sportage, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 388 litres | 564 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | 1353 litres | |
| Nissan Qashqai has 176 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 160 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 8000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |