Nissan Qashqai 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 6 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
| Nissan Qashqai is 32 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | 952 litres | |
| Nissan Qashqai has 117 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 561 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |