Nissan Qashqai 2007 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 1 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, but torque is 12 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. Despite less power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
| Nissan Qashqai and Hyundai Tucson are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 234 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Hyundai Tucson has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Qashqai, so Hyundai Tucson quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |