Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Nissan Qashqai and Toyota RAV4 have the same engine power, but Nissan Qashqai torque is 20 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1200 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
910 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Nissan Qashqai 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Toyota RAV4 2010 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2010 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.33 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.72 m | |
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 586 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | 1752 litres | |
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 176 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 239 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 2`140 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | high | |
Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7000 | 9400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |