Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Kia Sportage 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Nissan Qashqai engine produces 23 HP less power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Kia Sportage. Despite less power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai ix35, Kia Optima, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 11 cm shorter than the Kia Sportage, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 564 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | no data | |
|
Kia Sportage has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 154 litres less trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.58 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.02 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 8800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 8.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |