Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Qashqai) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Opel Mokka) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 15 HP less power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 144 NM less than Opel Mokka. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is larger, but lower. Nissan Qashqai is 5 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1513 litres | 1372 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage capacity. Nissan Qashqai has 54 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 141 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`830 kg | 1`959 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`312 kg | 1`490 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 518 kg | 469 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |