Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010

Nissan Qashqai
2010 - 2014
Mitsubishi ASX
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain


Power: 115 HP117 HP
Torque: 156 NM154 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds11.4 seconds
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving.
Nissan Qashqai engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 2 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.0
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway1260 km on highway
850 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank.


Average engine lifespan: 360'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 19 years14 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan MicraUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect.


Length: 4.33 m4.30 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.61 m1.62 m
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 410 litres419 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1513 litres1219 litres
Despite its longer length, Nissan Qashqai has 9 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. This could mean that the Nissan Qashqai uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 294 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8301`870
Safety: no data

Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 76006200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Qashqai has
Mitsubishi ASX has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: