Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Qashqai engine produces 67 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 133 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 1100 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1513 litres | 1790 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 277 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`930 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`407 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 523 kg | 490 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 12 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |