Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 11 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 1100 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 416 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | 1193 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Qashqai has 6 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. This could mean that the Nissan Qashqai uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 320 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |