Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 47 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| 1100 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 11 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 140 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |