Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Audi Q3 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 74 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 1100 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 184 mm (7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 5 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | no data | |
|
Audi Q3 has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 50 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |