Nissan Qashqai 2024 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda CX-30 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 158 HP | 116 - 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 270 NM | 213 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 - 6.4 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is larger. Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1447 litres | 1406 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage capacity. Nissan Qashqai has 25 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`015 | ~ 1`986 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 27 800 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |