Nissan Qashqai 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.7 | 1.3 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 - 163 HP | 116 - 159 HP | |
Torque: | 165 - 340 NM | 240 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 13 seconds | 9.3 - 11.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 5.8 | no data | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Ground clearance: | 180 - 182 mm (7.1 - 7.2 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.39 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.59 m | 1.61 m | |
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 10 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 472 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1598 litres | 1478 litres | |
Nissan Qashqai has 42 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 120 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`953 | ~ 1`970 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 15 800 | 18 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |