Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 103 - 150 HP | 110 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 156 - 320 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13 seconds | 7.4 - 11.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.2 | 5.3 - 9.9 | |
Nissan Qashqai petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Tiguan. On average, Nissan Qashqai equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.33 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 10 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | 1510 litres | |
Nissan Qashqai has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 3 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 1.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`985 | ~ 2`189 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 7000 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |