Nissan Qashqai 2010 vs Ford Kuga 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 - 150 HP | 136 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 - 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 13 seconds | 8.2 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.2 | 5.3 - 10.3 | |
|
Nissan Qashqai petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Nissan Qashqai equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1513 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 1 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`985 | ~ 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 6400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |