Nissan Pulsar 2015 vs Honda Jazz 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Pulsar engine produces 91 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 113 NM more than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Nissan Pulsar reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 42 litres | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Jazz engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Pulsar is 49 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 7 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | 883 litres | |
|
Nissan Pulsar has more luggage capacity. Nissan Pulsar has 48 litres more trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pulsar (by 512 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Jazz has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |