Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Ford Focus 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Focus is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pulsar engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford Focus. Due to the lower power, Nissan Pulsar reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pulsar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that by driving the Nissan Pulsar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Pulsar 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Pulsar 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
| Nissan Pulsar is 3 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 277 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | 1062 litres | |
|
Nissan Pulsar has more luggage capacity. Nissan Pulsar has 108 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pulsar (by 333 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Nissan Pulsar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Focus has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Ford Focus has
| |