Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pulsar engine produces 40 HP less power than Seat Ateca, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Seat Ateca. Due to the lower power, Nissan Pulsar reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pulsar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that by driving the Nissan Pulsar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pulsar consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Pulsar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Nissan Pulsar 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Pulsar 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.60 m | |
| Nissan Pulsar is 5 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Pulsar has 125 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. This could mean that the Nissan Pulsar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca, which means Nissan Pulsar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Pulsar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Seat Ateca has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Pulsar has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |