Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Pulsar engine produces 25 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Nissan Pulsar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pulsar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pulsar consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Nissan Pulsar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is larger. Nissan Pulsar is 36 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Pulsar has more luggage capacity. Nissan Pulsar has 97 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Nissan Pulsar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 535 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Renault Clio has
| |