Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Honda Jazz 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Nissan Pulsar engine produces 11 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 133 NM more than Honda Jazz. Despite the higher power, Nissan Pulsar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pulsar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pulsar consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Nissan Pulsar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pulsar consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Pulsar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Pulsar is 49 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 7 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | 883 litres | |
|
Nissan Pulsar has more luggage capacity. Nissan Pulsar has 48 litres more trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pulsar (by 512 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.1 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Jazz has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |