Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Fiat Tipo 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Fiat Tipo is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pulsar engine produces 10 HP less power than Fiat Tipo, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Fiat Tipo. Due to the lower power, Nissan Pulsar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pulsar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo, which means that by driving the Nissan Pulsar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Tipo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Pulsar 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Pulsar 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Pulsar is 2 cm longer than the Fiat Tipo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Pulsar has 55 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Tipo. This could mean that the Nissan Pulsar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.7 metres less than that of the Fiat Tipo, which means Nissan Pulsar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`795 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |