Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Pulsar engine produces 35 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Skoda Karoq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | no data | |
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.61 m | |
| Nissan Pulsar and Skoda Karoq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 521 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Nissan Pulsar has 136 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Pulsar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |