Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Renault Clio 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Pulsar engine produces 40 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Nissan Pulsar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Nissan Pulsar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is larger. Nissan Pulsar is 36 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 288 litres | |
|
Nissan Pulsar has more luggage capacity. Nissan Pulsar has 97 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 535 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Renault Clio has
| |