Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Hyundai i30 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 242 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pulsar engine produces 25 HP less power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 77 NM less than Hyundai i30. Due to the lower power, Nissan Pulsar reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that by driving the Nissan Pulsar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
| Nissan Pulsar is 5 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 395 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1301 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Pulsar has 10 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. This could mean that the Nissan Pulsar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai i30, which means Nissan Pulsar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Pulsar has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |