Nissan Pulsar 2014 vs Citroen C4 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Pulsar engine produces 16 HP less power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Citroen C4. Due to the lower power, Nissan Pulsar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Pulsar could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Pulsar consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Citroen C4 2015 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Citroen C4 2015 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Pulsar is 6 cm longer than the Citroen C4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Pulsar is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 408 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1183 litres | |
|
Citroen C4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Pulsar has 23 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4. This could mean that the Nissan Pulsar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Pulsar is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Nissan Pulsar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Pulsar scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Pulsar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Pulsar has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |